"THE EURO-2012 CAN ONLY GET Nicholas" – What's your name – Jose, Jose Maria, Mr. Aranda? Or simply – the referee? – Get acquainted with the guest. – Yeah, I have many names – laughing Aranda. – Can Jose Maria – it's my name, and Garcia Aranda – name by which I am known throughout the football world. Decide for yourself, and I was satisfied with all the options. – What was the opinion of Russian football – as the level of play and level of refereeing? – I watched games as the Premier League (for example, CSKA – "Spartacus") and the junior teams of 18 – Russia and Belarus … And the first impression – a positive one. As for officiating, I met with the arbitrators a variety of categories, with the experienced Baskakov, with the young judges. Russian judges have a good future. Something, of course, need to improve, but for that I am here – should raise a Russian arbitration at the world summit. – Solid positive, Jose Maria! At the same time, Russian referees are not very long ago worked for the European and world forums. Why? – Because the competition is high. Lucky ticket at the World Cup received a total of 24 judges. Not all good arbitrators may enter this list. – That is, after Valentin Ivanov, who consistently got the World Cup and Euro, we have not had a world-class judges? – Given that he was the last arbitrator, who worked at the World Championships from Russia, your words are a fact. But we will do everything we can to the following FM worked Russian judges. And we have time to get to the World Cup 2014 in Brazil. – And what about Euro 2012? – This tournament will have virtually the day after. Time is short. In an elite group of referees UEFA, among whose members and choose the best of the best, is currently only one Russian – Alexey Nikolaev. What percentage of the ladies that he would go to the Euro? Naturally, I wanted to give 100 percent, but getting there, I should say, it will be difficult. – Who of Russian judges can work on the Champions League? – Only Nikolaev, since it's only an elite list. "BEST IN THE WORLD – Webb. BUT Irmatov GOOD "- Who, in principle, today the best arbiter of the world, an icon of the judiciary? – Usually the icon is considered the arbitrator served the World Cup finals. Therefore, I will call the Englishman Howard Webb. But the level of Ravshan Irmatova, I should note, not below. This is a young, promising an arbitrator from Uzbekistan, which has all chances to become the best. – Pierluigi Collina, who oversees the judging in the Ukraine, held a briefing for journalists – in order to explain the examples of the nuances of the rules. Will you arrange such meetings with reporters? – Great idea! I'm ready. But not everything depends on my desires, and journalists must first make a request. – Are devote every Monday indiscriminately cn priori episodes on tour? – It is, of course. As soon see whether it is possible to arrange such a meeting. – Should the arbitrators to explain their decision to journalists – after the matches, a few days? – The judge's task is not included. Work arbitrator confined to the field. And it is clearly stated in the rules of FIFA and UEFA. Perhaps we should find someone who will be in the proper manner at the right time to comment on controversial decisions, but they should not be the judge. – There were times when the referee saw on the replay that was wrong, has publicly admitted the error. How about that? – Judge should not apologize to anyone for their mistakes. I have not seen any players or coaches apologized for their mistakes. And judges do is not worth it. – Sometimes, not only players, but the judge can afford a strong word. What do you think about this? – I think the players and judges should respect each other. All-over face should be punished in accordance with the disciplinary rules. – Dissatisfied with the arbitrator fans shouting: "The judge was on the soap" or rank as his sexual minorities. That judges were shouting in Spanish? – There are fans, too, "support" the cries of the judges, telling how and what should we do with them. It occurs worldwide, but some traditional chants do not exist. Usually it's just insulting. In Russia, the judges considered to sexual minorities? I do not know what I can do about it. I do not think that the judges themselves, these cries are a problem. "PREFER FOOTBALL WITHOUT ANY TECHNOLOGY – Previously we have in championship talked openly about the punishments received by the judges for errors. But this season all the punishment decided to keep a secret. Is this correct? – I do not know why penalties have decided to keep secret. – They say that this rules of FIFA and UEFA. – Well, if you say so … In many countries the rules, and they must be respected. But I believe that if the judge applied the official sanction, it is necessary to explain to people why it happened. – How do you refer to videopovtoram in football? – I personally do not mind, but only if it is technology that allows it to determine with absolute accuracy what happened in the game the moment. But now, as I understand it, these technologies do not. We all watched the replay several times penalties in a match scheduled Sukhinov "Anji" – "Rostov", but did not receive one hundred percent sure. Perhaps in the future of the stadium to hang 90-100 cells, which will see every episode as slow motion and accurately determine exactly what happened. Now these technologies do not. However, when they come, will come the death of the human factor, yet it is for this muchand love football. But this raises another question – what specific point in the game to introduce these technologies? Only to determine whether the ball crossed the goal line? Or maybe a second before it happened offside, which the judge did not notice? – But in hockey on these issues, too, thought, and still say "yes" video technology! – Replays of the game change, it ceases to be such, as we know it. It will be another sport, perhaps more akin to hockey. Personally, I prefer football without technology. With them, the judges simply can not grow. After the arbitrator initially placed at all outside the field, and only then decided to move it on the field, to become part of the game. And let's not remove the referee from the game. "Judges MUST be a professional" – Do not you think that Russian judges must be professionals and do not engage in any other work? – They must be professionals and work with full dedication, constantly improve themselves if they want to get to the list of top referees. – Many say that the Russian referees is no single treatment episodes … – Each judge – an individual, and judge it according to his personal qualities. Many people have different views on football, some judges a different experience, and similar episodes in football does not happen. – We do not know. There is a clear understanding of how to judge the British. But as the Russians tried? And what a way of judging is closer to you – the Russian, with lots of whistles, or English, with a maximum of struggle?
