The court will examine the constitutionality of the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of article 3, paragraph 1 of Article 8, Article 12.1 of the RF Law "On Status of Judges in the Russian Federation", articles 19, 21, 22 of the Federal Law "On the bodies of judicial community in the Russian Federation and the articles 1 -4 Code of Judicial Ethics. One thing to consider was the complaint of the former judge's Transfiguration of the District Court of Moscow Angelica Matyushenko, whose authority in 2008 to terminate the Qualification Collegium of Judges (CCF) in Moscow. "CCF has established that, considering a criminal case on appeal, the judge Matyushenko grossly violated the rules of criminal and criminal procedural law. The judge did not properly investigated the case materials and erroneously found the defendant there is intent to commit a crime. And leaving the designated international court punished by imprisonment, it jeopardized the lives and health of the defendant. Thus, the judge violated the general principles of sentencing and the principles of legality, equality, justice and humanism "- says the press service of the court. It also notes that the Trial Chamber of Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court quashed the appeal the judge's ruling Matyushenko and stopped due to lack of evidence that it had considered the case. Matyushenko CCR appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, but the appeal was denied. "According to the complainant, the impugned norms contradict the constitutional principles of independence, tenure and integrity of judges, and limit its freedom of speech. She believes that these regulations do not define the offense of the judge and admit the possibility of their randomly applied, as well as several provisions of the Code of Judicial Ethics, in attracting judges to disciplinary responsibility, "- also says in the message of the court.
Recent Comments
Related Posts
