Europe is paying for the colony

Andreev: So the question is, perhaps, above all to those who are often in Europe, and watch the scene, talking with the Europeans, know what they say and think. Because, of course, a problem exists. Here you write that the problem of migrants in Europe are more and more, the same problem in France, Italy, UK, Germany, where migrants are different but, nevertheless, everywhere society accepts them with difficulty. And the company probably does not make what could be done to these people simply assimilated into the country and become part of society. They are very common, and this is probably the main problem to live apart. In addition, live apart and starts the local, indigenous population, which feels somewhat slighted, which does not receive the benefits that the bulk of society. And, perhaps, just a vivid example of that – the United Kingdom. Vadim in touch with us. Hello! Vadim: Hi! I want to say that it is a repetition of past events. I studied in Britain in the 90s, and approximately in 1995-1996 there were similar riots in Brixton. It started with the same – at the police station one or two dark-skinned young man died. Apparently, there were instances of violence. According to different data, which is published there, they belonged to a criminal gang, but, nevertheless, because they were migrants, then, of course, they had big families, good connections, that is, the Mafia, belonging to the underworld, and it has stirred up quite a thick layer. Young people, of course, in all countries is explosive, but in an environment where young workers are living on benefits … Most importantly, migrants are not integrated into the life of a big state in culture. And it turns out the clash of two cultures and, perhaps, the two civilizations. Shaulina: And they do not integrate or not integrate? Vadim: They do not integrate. Integration does not happen for the simple reason that I come from some countries with the lowest levels of development, migrants do not have enough education, not enough of those starting opportunities to instantly become a level with the local population. And, accordingly, they remain human beings "second class". And due to the fact that they still have large families and that is running one or two people, and providing a family here, sending money "back", they are in a financial condition on the step below. And the result is a double lag. Shaulina: But here we are seeing here is what the picture: in the riots in the UK took part in the indigenous British, not those who send money to their relatives. Vadim: Indigenous Brits, but not English. Shaulina: But they were born in this country, they are citizens. Vadim: Yes, they were born in the country. But often there is the preservation of ties in more with the country they came from, rather than the perceived value of the country where they live, it becomes a problem. Excessive political correctness leads to the fact that instead of having to integrate this minority and, as in America, to create a "melting pot", which is all melted, and formed some sort of unified American nation, everything contributes to the fact that they came to save himself the form of some individual isolated colonies, regardless of what people have already been born there in the second generation: Indians live as Hindus, Muslims – their community, come and create a Russian Russian mafia or whatever you can say. There is no integration into a common culture. And, of course, social security benefits – is an extra time transgression.