On Tuesday, the ECHR adopted a series of notes, Russia has violated the European Convention on Human Rights when considering litigation firm in arbitration. That amount, considered the process unfair, Strasbourg and has, in fact the right to protect property of Yukos was broken. However, the ECHR found no political motive in court proceedings. The court did not recover with the required amount of compensation of the Russian Federation, explaining the actual time the sides have to agree on the amount. In the ECHR in 2004, appealed category Yukos shareholders. "We are not surprised, in fact the decision was taken … We respect this decision and we agree with him," – said an official follower of Yukos in court Pierce Gardner. He added, actually believed effective for a firm conviction. However, he described the negative precedent that, in fact the Court did not decide on compensation (previously urged the company in the form of compensation from the Russian record 98 billion euros). "Very much, actually left the European Court (Yukos), the probability of a request to arrange for compensation … There's nothing amazing, actually, they decided to divide the issues and not evaluated until the issue of compensation," – he said. Speaking separately on the prospects of the parties to agree on the amounts Gardner vyzayavil doubt, in fact the parties in the near future will dozayavlyatsya. "Of course, not feasible because the parties immediately agree," – he said. Explaining today's decision by the Court, Gardner drew attention to the fact it is not being actually own a legally binding for national courts, and yet, movedt influence decisions of national courts. Speaking about the possibility of appeal to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR, Gardner remembered the existing exercises, according to whom the parties have a good chance for 3 months to apply to the Grand Chamber with a request to render its decision on the case. So at least, Gardner, when asked about the possible timing of an appeal, raszayavil actually say about the specific date until early. In its own turn, the former director of Yukos's main commercial Misamor Bruce, commenting on the decision of the ECHR, said the fact "we have no doubt, by the very decision, but there is a – (doubt) in compensation." The Moscow Arbitration Court in 2004-2005, collected from Yukos for a total of 300 billion rubles more. zadolvednnosti to pay taxes for the 2000-2004 year. In addition, Yukos Arbitration Moscow dismissed the suit for annulment of the auction for prodaved "Yuganskneftegaz" and compensation for his 388.3 billion rubles. spending their stredstv.
Recent Comments
Related Posts
