On Thursday held its first hearing in public on interstate claim of Georgia, a few hours to complete them in posledstviidstviidstvii videotape of the meeting was posted on the website of the court. The Georgian side asked for the first time the ECHR August 12, 2008, but irrevocably, with various additions, the claim was filed February 6, 2009. The petition she accused Moscow of "assault otechesvennyh troops on the lives and property of the manor of Georgian population regions "of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The document states in violation of Russian art. 2 (right to life), Art. 3 (prohibition of torture and degrading treatment), Art. 5 (right to freedom of individual privacy), Art. 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Art. 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and more art. 1 of Protocol 1 (protection of property) and Art. 2 (freedom of movement) of the Protocol 4. The Russian side at the hearing remembered, in fact Russian armed forces have worked in response to combat the impact of the Georgian peacekeepers against otechesvennyh and gentlemen, "confesses itself wholly an international law", and even to "prevent an escalation of intsendenta and further damage." At present Russia followers noticed the actual intervention was neutralized, and the troops were withdrawn immediately to a mission in posledstviidstviidstvii ispolneniya. "First of all, none of the international instruments that fix the laws of war do not provide the jurisdiction of this court. Secondly, a similar role would be contrary to the exclusion of cases from the jurisdiction of the national security of the Council of Europe. Third, any attempt to investigate compliance with this Court on the rights of the master's doomed fight, "- said the Russian side, lawyer Michael Svenston. He also said, in fact domestic jurisdiction does not extend to Abkhazia, South Ossetia and the adjacent Georgian lands. The Georgian side urges the court to the contrary. In her opinion, Russia controlled data zemlel and should be responsible for violations by their manorial rights. After the meeting, the arbitrator went away for a decision on the admissibility of the claim, which will be announced later. For these public relations department of the court, the deadline for a decision does not exist. It has two interstate claim of Georgia to Russia in the European Court of Human Rights. The first claim was submitted March 26, 2007 on "pursuing the masters of Georgia on the ground of the Russian Federation." The Strasbourg court June 30, 2009 adopted the eligibility review of the claim of Georgia. January 31, 2011 ECHR began its substantive discussion of the case and interviewed witnesses and victims on both sides. The final decision on the case until he made. Russia in a posledstviidstviidstvii in "five-day war" in early August 2008, adopted the autonomy of former Georgian autonomies – Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Tbilisi declared Abkhazia and South Ossetia occupied lands and severed diplomatic relations with Russia.
Recent Comments
Related Posts
