The Obama administration has reason to be cautious about the U.S. intervention in Syria. For the United States to launch a military strike without the approval of the Security Council of the United Nations would “act of war” an illegal against a sovereign state. (The precedent of Kosovo can not make an illegal act legal). Awkwardly, the reality is quite different: there have been absolutely no published evidence to support the claim that the forces of President Bashar al-Assad have been responsible for this, or any other gas attack in Syria. Uncomfortable as it may be of some European governments and regional authorities, who have been cheerleaders in the case of U.S. intervention, or …
- 'Unwinding' chromosomes: A singular perspective on determinants of chromosomal width
- Ninth spherical of EU sanctions on Russia revealed
- Ronaldo responds to Saudi mega-deal claims
- China declares main adjustments to Covid restrictions
- Nearing the reality on the Biden racket
5 recent posts for today:
- Vegetation: Scientists remedy the thriller behind an enigmatic organelle, the pyrenoid
- Democrats Lose Collection of Debates [semi-satire]
- US senators Sanders, Murphy & Lee introduce bipartisan invoice to rein in presidential struggle powers & international weapons offers
- Not way back, the middle of the Milky Means exploded
- Breaking the dimensions and pace restrict of modulators: The workhorses of the web