The Obama administration has reason to be cautious about the U.S. intervention in Syria. For the United States to launch a military strike without the approval of the Security Council of the United Nations would “act of war” an illegal against a sovereign state. (The precedent of Kosovo can not make an illegal act legal). Awkwardly, the reality is quite different: there have been absolutely no published evidence to support the claim that the forces of President Bashar al-Assad have been responsible for this, or any other gas attack in Syria. Uncomfortable as it may be of some European governments and regional authorities, who have been cheerleaders in the case of U.S. intervention, or …
Leave a Reply
- In Israel, the Palestinian gunman killed three police officers
- In Irkutsk arrested geneem'n supporter of the IG, who was on the list for international
- 10 reasons why the trip to mars may not be as comfortable as you think
- "Yeltsin Centre" the repayment of the construction loan of 2 billion rubles
- Russian diplomats in the united states of america commented on the appearance ofâ textbook about the war with Russia
5 recent posts for today:
- Announced trump, on 3 September’n day of prayer for the victims of the hurricane “Harvey”, September 1, 2017
- U.S. intelligence services require research leaked information on monitoring of Internet users, June 9, 2013
- Quot vkontakte quot appeared the status of quot only friends quot, March 10, 2011
- Savings Bank: the ruble at the end of the year weakened to 68 rubles to the dollar, May 24, 2017
- Russian doctors do not leave Yemen, April 26, 2015
