Oleg Sentsov, whose imprisonment in Russia made him a figurehead for the nation’s critics, is now free to speak to the media however – shock! – not the whole lot he says matches the narratives favored by those that reward him.
Turning a person into a logo for a political trigger all the time carries the danger that the particular person received’t reside as much as expectations. A Crimean-born ethnic Russian, Sentsov rose to worldwide prominence as a ‘prisoner of conscience,’ whose opposition to the ‘Russian annexation of Crimea’ led to an unfair 20-year jail time period. The hashtag #FreeSentsov popped up all through the world, whereas film celebrities made public statements to assist him.
Sentsov’s title is at present within the headlines after he was launched as a part of a prisoner swap between Moscow and Kiev, a transfer made doable by the election of a brand new president in Ukraine. Now a free man, he’s making ready to obtain his Sakharov Award from final 12 months, and is spending time giving interviews. Naturally, his story is again within the papers, and a few protection is extra eulogistic than others.
For instance, the New York Occasions mentioned that Sentsov “infuriated the Kremlin by insisting that he and fellow Russian-speakers in Crimea by no means needed or wanted to be saved,” and was put in jail “for that and different outspoken heresies – all of the stronger as a result of they arrive from an ethnic Russian, not a Ukrainian nationalist.”
“All wars finally finish in peace," mentioned Oleg Sentsov, a 43-year-old Ukrainian filmmaker simply launched from a Russian jail within the arctic." However peace between Russia and Ukraine won’t occur as long as Putin is in energy.” https://t.co/mZOALyxHXe
— New York Occasions World (@nytimesworld) September 28, 2019
Granted, Sentsov might be a Ukrainian patriot, not a Ukrainian nationalist – although the ranks of Ukrainian nationalists are full of people that joined as a result of they shared white supremacist convictions or just hated Russia, so the traces are fairly blurry there.
However the concept that Russia one way or the other compelled the folks of Crimea (over 90 % of them) to vote at gunpoint for rejoining Russia in 2014, and that Sentsov suffered as a result of he dared to talk out whereas others saved mum is solely not true. Simply ask Sentsov himself.
Sentsov says #Crimea has all the time oriented itself in the direction of Russia and by no means been absolutely Ukrainian. On the finish says Crimea extra comfy in #Russia than #Ukraine.
I sense a Nadiya Savchenko future for him. @bneeditor @27khv pic.twitter.com/UHvKGVsujM
— from_kherson (@KhersonFrom) September 27, 2019
“Did you are feeling like Crimea was all the time aligned with Russia or is fable?” the activist was requested by a Radio Free Europe journalist in an interview printed this week. “Sadly that was all the time true,” was his response.
[Crimea] by no means was absolutely Ukrainian.
Sentsov blames Kiev for this. “A number of the issues had been executed [by the Ukrainian government] by pressure and in a incorrect approach. Others that ought to have been stopped and which led to separatism… had not been stopped,” he defined.
He even agreed that Crimeans sought Russian safety as a result of they had been afraid of what they noticed on TV – footage of Maidan protesters hurling firebombs at police traces, and other people being gunned down by ‘mysterious’ snipers on the street – and didn’t need to expertise the identical form of violence. A Maidan activist himself, Sentsov, in fact, attributes these fears to “Russian propaganda,” nevertheless it’s not like all these (still-uninvestigated) deaths in Kiev had been fabricated.
Additionally on rt.com
He’s additionally not a peaceable thinker alongside the traces of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn who suffered for his films, because the article within the Occasions and comparable publications might lead readers to imagine. His sole movie is a non-political drama which, regardless of supposedly being “critically acclaimed,” has not been aired even as soon as by Ukrainian tv in your complete time he was held in Russian custody. Not an encouraging signal for a world-famous director.
The person is definitely no stranger to violence. In one other contemporary interview, he mentioned he “took half in avenue combating” in Kiev and was about to journey again to Ukraine to affix one of many volunteer battalions when he was arrested. The battalions had been created by the post-Maidan Ukrainian authorities, and had been predominantly comprised of hardcore nationalists who needed to quash a rise up within the east of the nation. Sentsov mentioned he knew folks in these models.
Sentsov insists that nothing he did in Crimea was legal and denies main a cell of would-be Ukrainian resistance fighters, whom the Russian prosecution accused of making an attempt to torch the workplace of a pro-Russian social gathering and making ready to explode a Lenin monument. However he definitely was involved with individuals who needed to “create guerrilla squads and fall again to the woods,” he admitted. Think about how, for instance, the FBI would have proceeded after intercepting such communications by itself turf.
The 43-year-old just isn’t even the primary Ukrainian to turn into the focus of a media PR marketing campaign after going to jail in Russia, solely to later reveal a much less narrative-friendly facet.
Additionally on rt.com
Keep in mind helicopter gunner Nadya Savchenko, the hero of Ukraine breathlessly depicted by the press as a contemporary Joan of Arc unjustly imprisoned by the Kremlin below fabricated homicide prices? And the way after she returned early following a prisoner swap and abruptly turned out to be a unfastened cannon, who criticized the Ukrainian authorities till she acquired locked up for plotting to slaughter your complete Ukrainian parliament? She and Sentsov even each claimed to be on report starvation strikes whereas in jail.
Sentsov might not find yourself turning from a revered determine conveniently saved away in a Russian jail right into a speaker of uncomfortable truths requiring some inventive pondering to handle. However Savchenko’s precedent is definitely a cautionary story.
By Alexandre Antonov, RT
Subscribe to RT e-newsletter to get tales the mainstream media received’t let you know.