In her zeal to beat off challengers to her occasion’s hardline anti-Russia orthodoxy, Hillary Clinton has solely succeeded in sowing discord between the crop of Democratic presidential contenders. How very ‘Putin-esque’ of her.
Unfounded blaming of Russia for her personal woes is nothing new from Hillary Clinton, who nonetheless blames the Kremlin for denying her the presidency three years in the past. If it wasn’t ‘Russian hackers’ leaking her emails, it was ‘Russian bots’ backing Bernie Sanders within the Democratic main, or Vladimir Putin convincing the Inexperienced Get together’s Jill Stein to mount a third-party problem. Although none of those accusations had been based in actuality, Russia-bashing has change into Clinton’s inventory in commerce.
Her suggestion final week that “the Russians” had been “grooming” 2020 candidate Tulsi Gabbard to run as a third-party candidate subsequent 12 months to separate the Democratic vote was nothing stunning, particularly as Gabbard’s overseas insurance policies – opposition to “regime change wars” and assist for higher Washington-Moscow ties – have seen her marketing campaign smeared from the get go.
Additionally on rt.com
Except for as soon as once more making Clinton the poster-child for ‘Russiagate’ delusion, that assertion succeeded in inflicting some inner ructions inside the occasion and its supporters within the media.
There have been those that distanced themselves from Clinton. Fringe candidates Andrew Yang and Marianne Williamson defended Gabbard, with Williamson accusing Clinton of “the character assassination of girls who don’t toe the occasion line,” and Yang commending Gabbard’s navy service (Within the US navy, not Russia’s).
“Tulsi just isn’t being groomed by anybody,” Texas Consultant Beto O’Rourke added on Saturday, whereas South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg advised CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday that “statements like that should be backed by proof.”
Even Tapper referred to as Clinton’s declare an “apparent smear” and a “wild accusation.” Fellow CNN host Van Jones accused the previous contender of enjoying “a really harmful recreation,” and denounced her for giving Gabbard “payback hell” for quitting the DNC and supporting Bernie Sanders in 2016.
Van Jones says Hillary Clinton smeared Tulsi Gabbard “with no details” & provides Tulsi is getting “payback hell” for quitting DNC & backing Bernie in 2016 pic.twitter.com/jzGdmLMJzL
— Ibrahim (@ibrahimpols) October 19, 2019
Then there have been those that remained silent. Frontrunners Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders have saved mum on the scandal, save for a Sanders aide commenting on Twitter. On-line debate amongst Democrats has raged over whether or not their silence is a refusal so as to add oxygen to the fireplace, or an endorsement of Clinton’s place.
Keep in mind when @TulsiGabbard resigned as Vice Chair of the DNC to endorse @BernieSanders in 2016? It was such an enormous coup for him, Bernie made a complete marketing campaign advert that includes Tulsi. Time to return the favor, Senator Sanders. pic.twitter.com/0FdSmtL7C5
— Sharmine Narwani (@snarwani) October 19, 2019
How everybody seems to be proper now ready on Bernie Sanders to defend Tulsi Gabbard from Hillary Clinton pic.twitter.com/sT8Rr3k1fL
— Primary Bisexual Bitch?️ (@antiwarmisfit) October 19, 2019
And to institution Democrats who’ve way back swallowed the Russian kool-aid, anybody backing Gabbard right here is now a Russian asset by affiliation.
Tulsi Gabbard remains to be listed as a Fellow of the Sanders Institute. Proper now. Tonight. She was carefully related along with his final marketing campaign, and is supported by lots of his most ardent followers. Bernie should disavow all affiliation with Gabbard. https://t.co/kbWxnIR7mZ
— Tom Watson (@tomwatson) October 18, 2019
Division and discord. Precisely what Russiagaters spent the final two years accusing Moscow of sowing within the US. However there’s no want to rent hackers and pump out pretend information when Hillary Clinton is greater than keen to do the legwork herself.
Clinton as soon as insisted that her occasion defend its personal, declaring earlier this 12 months that criticism of California Senator Kamala Harris – an institution favourite – was each sexist and a betrayal of occasion values.
“When you don’t need to assist Democrats,” she stated, “then go someplace else.”
Hillary Clinton concerning the assaults on Kamala Harris: “It feeds into sexism and misogyny. She’s being attacked by the left. Sufficient. When you don’t need to assist Democrats, go someplace else.”
Additionally, racism. pic.twitter.com/HuRQGQHhG3
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) January 26, 2019
When Harris was smeared this summer season by right-wing trolls who questioned whether or not she was “black sufficient” to debate racial points, your entire crop of 2020 candidates rushed to her protection. “Kamala Harris doesn’t have shit to show,” tweeted New Jersey Senator Cory Booker. Biden referred to as the smear “disgusting,” Warren stated it was “racist and ugly,” and Sanders referred to as it merely “racist.”
No such luck for Tulsi Gabbard. For all her speak of occasion unity and supporting Democrats above all, Clinton is clearly solely keen to assist the proper of Democrat. What her occasion ought to understand is that inner division, the settling of outdated scores, and the fixed resuscitation of Russiagate conspiracy theories could price them dearly within the runup to subsequent 12 months’s election.
By Graham Dockery, RT
Like this story? Share it with a pal!