Donald Trump’s risk to chop off Iraq’s entry to its account on the Federal Reserve Financial institution of New York if Baghdad insists on a withdrawal of US troops from its soil is bare-faced, modern-day colonialism.
Let’s set the scene.
On January 5, the Iraqi parliament voted to approve a decision calling for the elimination of US troops. A day later, Donald Trump threatened to hit Iraqis with lethal financial sanctions “like they’ve by no means seen earlier than” if Baghdad tries to expel American troops with out first “paying us again” for an “terribly costly air base” constructed there.
Days later, when Fox Information anchor Laura Ingraham grotesquely steered that Iraq ought to certainly “repay the American taxpayer” for the bottom — constructed after US forces laid waste to the nation in an unlawful invasion — Trump, in typical vogue, didn’t even attempt to cloak his risk in niceties, choosing unequivocal blackmail as a substitute.
“We’ve got a whole lot of their cash proper now. We’ve got 35 billion of their cash proper now sitting in an account — and I believe they’re going to conform to pay. I believe they’re going to conform to pay, in any other case we’ll keep there.”
How embarrassing for People this man is. A shame. He feels like a mobster or an extortionist. #MAGA ?#Syria #Iraq #Trump pic.twitter.com/XbsNyp8Mi7
— Walid (@walid970721) January 12, 2020
Iraq retains its income from oil gross sales, which accounts for 90 % of its funds, within the New York financial institution. Like many different international locations around the globe, they do that so as to have the ability to entry the dominant US greenback, however that comes with dangers. Iraqi officers have warned of whole financial collapse if Trump goes by means of with the risk to impose new sanctions and maintain the nation’s cash hostage, at a time when Iraqis are struggling to get by and tensions within the area are already on the rise.
On this context, Trump’s remark to Ingraham sounds just like the equal of one thing you may hear in a mobster film: You be good, do what we are saying — and perhaps then we gained’t kill your loved ones.
What occurred to Washington’s deep need to safe freedom and democracy for the Iraqi individuals? In a press release launched following the Iraqi parliament’s vote to expel American troops — which have been current within the nation to struggle ISIS militants underneath a 2014 deal — the US State Division by some means managed to utterly ignore the decision and as a substitute harp on about how it’s a “drive for good” within the area. Calling the US’s presence within the nation “acceptable,” the assertion shot down the notion that US troops could be leaving any time quickly.
Additionally on rt.com
That is basically the US as soon as once more asserting itself as a brute occupying drive in Iraq, blatantly ignoring Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi’s request for Washington to start preparations for withdrawal. Barely an eyebrow was raised in Western media, although, as a result of for too lengthy there was an assumption that American troops have a easy, unassailable proper to be in Iraq. It has by some means turn out to be utterly regular and unremarkable for the US to dictate the phrases of Iraq’s survival.
The assertion went on to claim that the US desires to be a “companion” to a “sovereign” Iraq. An actual “companion” doesn’t use threats of devastating financial warfare as leverage — and if Trump or any of the empire-driven neocons advising him have been actually concerned about a sovereign Iraq, they’d respect the needs of the Iraqi parliament and set in movement a plan to take away America’s troops.
That is pure thuggery. "The Trump administration warned Iraq this week that it dangers dropping entry to a vital authorities checking account if Baghdad kicks out American forces … in accordance with Iraqi officers." https://t.co/ID9plNgyL5 pic.twitter.com/TSDPsk2qfk
— Shashank Joshi (@shashj) January 11, 2020
It’s not the primary time the US has threatened to freeze Iraq’s Fed account and used its personal cash as leverage to supply favored geopolitical outcomes. In 2008, the Bush administration used the identical tactic to drive Iraq to signal an unpopular army deal prolonging its earlier occupation. Barack Obama admitted, in spite of everything, that the US engages in “arm-twisting” to drive different nations to “do what we want them to do.”
If it got here right down to it, Washington could be completely completely satisfied to make use of Iraq as a battleground on which to struggle a conflict towards Iran — and that is precisely the rationale why Iraqis have begun to really feel more and more uneasy a couple of continued US troop presence of their nation. Removed from a “drive for good” within the area, the US is a bringer of chaos — and Iraq is aware of that higher than anybody else.
Additionally on rt.com
Like this story? Share it with a pal!