Beijing has lashed out at nations fanning fears of the novel coronavirus — which thus far claimed 259 lives — insisting that its response towards the lethal illness goes far past requirements accepted worldwide.
“We have now adopted probably the most complete and strictest prevention and management measures, and lots of of them go far past the necessities of the Worldwide Well being Rules,” Overseas Minister Wang Yi assured whereas talking together with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on Saturday.
China’s efforts are [aimed at] not solely defending the well being of its personal folks, but additionally safeguarding the well being of individuals worldwide. Governments and the World Well being Group have given full recognition to this.
The loss of life toll from the beforehand unknown virus has risen to 259 in a single day — all registered in China — with nearly 12,000 confirmed instances elsewhere on the planet.
Beijing “doesn’t agree with the strategy adopted by particular person nations to create rigidity and even panic,” the minister identified, reminding that the World Well being Group (WHO) “didn’t approve of journey or commerce restrictions on China.”
However, nations around the globe rush to comprise the unfold of the brand new coronavirus outbreak, together with closing borders, introducing stricter screening of these coming back from China, or suspending direct flights to and from Chinese language cities. Others have dramatically escalated journey advisories for the world’s most populous nation.
READ MORE: China’s coronavirus: We survive a lot worse yearly, however the panic is the true hazard
A day in the past, the US issued a journey warning, likening the hazard of travelling to China to that of Iraq and Afghanistan. Though the emergency measure got here shortly earlier than well being authorities recognized a seventh case within the US, it raised ire in Beijing.
“Simply because the WHO really helpful towards journey restrictions, the US rushed in the other way,” responded Hua Chunying, the Overseas Ministry spokeswoman. “This has set a foul instance. It’s definitely not a gesture of goodwill.”
Additionally on rt.com
Like this story? Share it with a buddy!