George Galloway: This monument-toppling cultural revolution doesn’t absolve Britain’s imperial crimes, historic or trendy

Britain is within the grip of a revolution. A lot to the reduction of the nation’s ruling elite, it’s a cultural revolution, and never an financial or political one.

Going through an financial recession of historic dimensions and presiding over a number of the grimmest Covid-19 statistics on the planet, Britain is convulsed over whether or not the peccadilloes of Boy Scouts founder Robert Baden-Powell have been sufficiently ugly to justify his likeness taking a dip in Poole Harbour, just like the slave dealer Edward Colston did in Bristol Harbour.

In fact the hypocrites bewailing Colston struggling the identical destiny as tens of hundreds of his victims tossed overboard – normally, however not all the time, lifeless – from his slave ships as “undemocratic” miss the purpose that hardly anyone in England even had the vote when the statue was erected.

Learn extra

And Baden-Powell’s chief offence, cosying as much as Adolf Hitler, was the norm reasonably than the exception amongst the ruling caste within the 1930s. His angle to imperialist wars in Africa was par for the course in Britain in his period, too.

Cecil Rhodes, who nonetheless towers over Oxford College, is actually an egregious instance of racist venality. He wasn’t only a brutal racist and imperialist; he systemised racism, paving the best way to apartheid – nowhere extra so than within the nation which for a time bore his very title: Rhodesia.

But when something sums up the triumph of identification politics over class politics, it’s the extraordinary verve with which tens of millions of individuals all over the world have poured their braveness and vitality into the Black Lives Matter protests, whereas Britain CONTINUES to be as much as its neck in imperialist crimes that are largely unprotested.

Lives do not appear to matter in Yemen, for instance, the place plague and famine of biblical proportions are exacerbated by British- and American- enabled assaults which have killed a whole bunch of hundreds of individuals. Not in centuries passed by, however now.

Arab lives in Syria have not mattered to greater than a handful of individuals in Britain all through practically a decade of express army, political, monetary and propaganda help to fanatic hordes searching for to destroy the secular Arab Republic.

Additionally on rt.com

When black individuals hung like unusual fruit from Libyan timber following the UK/US/French invasion of the nation and the sodomising with a bayonet of its chief, liberals like Hillary Clinton and David Cameron laughed – actually, in Clinton’s case.

In Britain, the place round 60,000 extra deaths have been reported by the Workplace of Nationwide Statistics and the Monetary Instances over just some months in 2020, a vastly disproportionate variety of these deaths have been suffered by BAME residents. These black lives do not appear to have mattered a lot. Not sufficient to protest about, no less than.

Had been disgust – solely justified – on the crimes of British imperialism in earlier centuries translated right into a willpower to finish the default British place of interfering in each a part of the world – as much as and together with precise invasion – that may be factor in fact, nonetheless unlikely.

Learn extra

Unlikely as a result of the British crimes of the previous did not occur as a result of the criminals have been British. They didn’t occur as a result of the criminals have been, psychologically talking, sociopathic and infrequently probably psychopathic people – though a lot of them have been, judging by their actions. Captain Prepare dinner did not slice off the limbs of recalcitrant natives within the antipodes as a result of he cherished the sight of blood (although he would possibly nicely have) however as a result of he was in regards to the enterprise of conquest and empire. And empire is in regards to the enterprise of enterprise. Britain conquered a lot of the world to not hand out bibles however to loot every thing they might carry – together with, within the type of slavery, the very individuals of the invaded lands themselves.

Imperialism is ineluctably a growth of our capitalist mannequin, the necessity for captive markets and low-cost (ideally free) sources of labour, fundamental commodities and uncooked supplies.

It was not the British working class who benefitted from the British Empire – not the wage-slaves of the slavers. The colonised peoples and the slaves all had the identical enemy, which consumed the blood, sweat and tears of us all. The enemy is at dwelling. Not within the 17th century, however now.

Suppose your mates would have an interest? Share this story!