You are here : World News – Russian opinion» IMPORTANT» Tony Blair calls US Afghanistan withdrawal ‘imbecilic’ – What, then, was the Bush-Blair invasion of 2001?
Tony Blair calls US Afghanistan withdrawal ‘imbecilic’ – What, then, was the Bush-Blair invasion of 2001?
Serial warmonger Tony Blair has blasted the US resolution to drag out from Afghanistan, however historical past tells us the true insanity was invading the unconquerable nation within the first place.
Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair –aka ‘The Blair Creature’– isn’t a contented bunny this Sunday, of us. He has stated that the choice to withdraw western forces from Afghanistan was made “in obedience to an imbecilic slogan about ending the ‘perpetually wars’.”
What he calls the US’ ‘abandonment’ of Afghanistan was “tragic, harmful and pointless.”
The truth is lets say the identical about Tony Blair himself – and definitely the wars of selection he promoted.
Imbecilic? That’s the proper phrase to explain what occurred in October 2001 when Afghanistan was invaded in response, we have been advised, to the terrorist assaults of 9/11, although not one of the terrorists have been Afghan nationals.
Learn extra
UK says ALL Afghan embassy guards will obtain safety, in about-face after diplomats fled leaving native employees behind – studies
Had Blair learn just a bit little bit of historical past, he would have pursued an completely diplomatic path to try to get Osama Bin Laden handed over and never have been so eager to ship within the troops.
As I wrote within the Day by day Specific in 2009 in an article entitled ’Afghanistan: Historical past repeats itself,’ “‘That males don’t be taught very a lot from the teachings of historical past is an important of all the teachings of historical past,’ stated Aldous Huxley. Nowhere is that this extra relevant than within the case of the various unsuccessful makes an attempt by overseas powers to beat Afghanistan.”
I went on: “The mighty forces of the British Empire failed 3 times between 1839 and 1919. The Soviet Union, which on the time had the most important military on this planet, tried in 1979: they too have been defeated.”
However in 2001, Blair and the then American President George W. Bush thought they might buck the development. They might topple the Taliban (which they did) and remake Afghanistan – a deeply conservative and really non secular nation – within the western secular picture. Afghanistan can be remodeled from a ‘failed terror state’ right into a ‘functioning democracy.’ What folly. What imperial conceitedness.
At present, Blair is busily attempting to spin the invasion of 2001 as a ‘success.’ However, whereas some issues did enhance, ‘Operation Enduring Freedom’ definitely didn’t convey peace to Afghanistan.
In response to the UN Help Mission in Afghanistan, 579 civilians have been killed in aerial operations between January and September 2019. That’s greater than double the quantity ten years earlier. Practically 111,000 civilians have been killed or injured within the nation since 2009.
Removed from bringing stability, the 2001 western navy invasion, identical to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, was a serious explanation for instability.
I recall chatting to a pleasant Afghan taxi driver a few years in the past and saying to him how I’d love to go to the nation to see its nice pure magnificence. “Don’t go,” he stated. “It‘s far too harmful. You’ll be focused.”
A lot for Afghanistan being ‘protected’ post-invasion.
At any time when the US withdrew, we’d have had scenes of chaos. However the People needed to pull-out sooner or later in any other case its forces would have been in Afghanistan perpetually. That doesn’t appear to concern ‘The Blair Creature’ an excessive amount of. ‘Endlessly wars’ aren’t a terrific drawback to him or certainly the ‘Contained in the Tent‘ political and media figures who promote them. They’re, although, for the troopers who die in them, and for his or her grieving households.
Additionally on rt.com
No less than 7 civilians killed in crowd surges amid Kabul airport evacuation chaos – UK navy
‘However the US and British forces might have stayed in a assist function,’ we’re listening to. However, as was identified final week, there’s a phrase for nations whose governments solely endure due to overseas navy assist. The phrase is “colony.”
Blair and his supporters are tacitly admitting that Afghanistan, billed as a ‘sovereign democratic nation’, was truly a colony. I assumed ‘imperialism’ was purported to be a nasty factor that we’re all purported to be ashamed of. So why is it okay with regards to Afghanistan?
Afghanistan is just about not possible for overseas powers to subjugate. There’s its hostile terrain, its harsh climate, its fiercely unbiased people who find themselves very courageous, very robust and are extremely expert in mountain warfare. However anybody who’d learn the historical past books would have identified all this and never intervened within the first place.
Tony Blair, along with his Messiah complicated, thought he’d be totally different. He might reach Afghanistan the place different, lesser mortals had failed. However the ‘new’ neocon empire met with precisely the identical end result because the previous empire did. Wasn’t it ‘imbecilic’ to suppose it might be any totally different?
