A jumbo gig to boost consciousness of local weather change & defeat poverty positively made a couple of rich folks be ok with themselves for having completed their bit for a worthy trigger. However can World Citizen Dwell actually change the world?
On Saturday evening, the BBC devoted hours of programming to World Citizen Dwell: Music Pageant for the Planet – a set of pop live shows and performances from London, New York, Paris, Lagos, Mumbai, Seoul and Sydney in assist of the World Citizen motion.
As much as a billion folks across the globe have been anticipated to tune right into a 24-hour broadcast, a method or one other. However are rich pop stars actually the very best ambassadors for the trigger?
Based on its web site, “World Citizen is a motion of engaged residents who’re utilizing their collective voice to finish excessive poverty by 2030. By way of our mixture of content material and occasions, grassroots organizing, and our motion platform, we’re constructing a motion to finish poverty. We manage large world campaigns to amplify the actions of World Residents from world wide.”
Learn extra
Nobody might disagree that ending excessive poverty is a worthy trigger. However watching the opening jiffy of the present, that includes Ok-pop superstars BTS and Kiwi singer-songwriter Lorde, this was virtue-signalling gone mad. Furthermore, whereas World Citizen was asking for donations to offer faculty meals, plant bushes and ship vaccines, this was finally an advocacy marketing campaign getting free airtime on the supposedly politically impartial BBC.
For starters, lots of the performers are mega-wealthy themselves. On the Paris gig, for instance, the headliners have been Ed Sheeran (reported web value £200 million) and Elton John (value a cool £350 million).
Given said intention of World Citizen is “tackling inequality”, are these stars suggesting everybody ought to get the identical? Will they be giving up their fortunes to make the world extra equal? I don’t assume they need to – they’ve made their cash by offering thousands and thousands of individuals with leisure. But it surely sticks within the throat for the remainder of us to be lectured to in regards to the evils of inequality by individuals who stay in such luxurious.
Whereas Elton and Ed have made an excellent play of the tax they pay, pop stars don’t precisely have an excellent monitor document on paying their dues the best way the little folks need to. Because the so-called Paradise Papers revealed in 2017, some stars have gone to nice lengths to search out authorized methods to be ‘tax environment friendly’ with their money.
Admittedly, as George Harrison wrote within the Beatles track ‘Taxman’, eye-watering tax charges – “one for you, 19 for me”, because the track says – solely encourage tax avoidance. However possibly musicians and different celebrities might be somewhat extra circumspect in telling us about world poverty whereas guaranteeing their ‘justifiable share’ of tax is as small as doable.
As for saving the planet, these are individuals who really feel that flying around the world in personal jets is the hallmark of getting made it. On the very least, they’re properly versed in turning left after they get on a jet, lapping it up in the most costly seats on the entrance. Whizzing between continents and residing in mansions, their carbon footprints have to be monumental, in comparison with these of the remainder of us. The epitome of ineffective celebs, Harry and Meghan, even rocked up on the New York live performance to lecture the world about vaccines.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are right here to speak to you about ensuring getting vaccinated is a human proper. #GlobalCitizenLive #GlobalCitizen #PowerTheMovement ⭕️ #HarryAndMeghanInNYC @GlblCtzn pic.twitter.com/xmplOMEGVI
— ROB AURELIO®️ (@RobAurelius) September 25, 2021
Based on World Citizen, local weather change is “an existential menace to folks and nature worldwide”, so it’s as much as us to “urge world leaders, company executives and other people in all places to take motion”. However what would that “motion” seem like? More than likely it means clamping down on greenhouse-gas emissions, and the upshot is insurance policies that make folks worse off, each within the developed world and in poorer nations.
In richer nations, it means making power way more costly, leaving many individuals on low incomes to decide on between consuming and heating. In poorer nations that need entry to dependable sources of electrical energy, it implies that huge worldwide funders are refusing loans to construct coal-fired energy stations: simply the sort of low cost, easy-to-use networked electrical energy provide that has lifted billions of individuals out of poverty previously.
Learn extra
What poorer nations want is financial improvement and entry to worldwide markets to allow them to create the roles wanted to offer their residents with higher incomes. However what World Citizen gives is affordable speak about improvement whereas interfering within the democratic debate that tries to stability all these competing issues in regards to the setting, residing requirements, freedom and extra. It’s poverty and underdevelopment, not local weather change, that’s the actual existential menace to the poorest folks on the earth.
World Citizen Dwell will little question have made a couple of rich folks be ok with themselves by doing their bit for a worthy trigger. Their advantage was on show to thousands and thousands world wide. However the marketing campaign – a minimum of, in the case of local weather change – is weird, as a result of politicians are already falling over themselves to point out how a lot they care in regards to the planet. So, the movers and shakers behind World Citizen get to hob-nob with the good and the nice, the well-known and the highly effective, to resolve how we must always all be compelled to stay our lives, and the message to society from these pampered billionaires is ‘make do with much less’.
In the meantime, the remainder of us are lowered, at greatest, to the position of a stage military to reveal that civil society helps ‘taking motion’. Thanks, however I’d choose to have the ability to warmth my dwelling, drive my automotive and have a vacation overseas a couple of times a yr. Till we’ve got a critical and sincere political debate about these points, we’ll all be worse off.
Like this story? Share it with a good friend!