As the remainder of the world seeks to navigate a recent course in the case of coping with the fact of a Taliban-led Afghanistan, the US finds itself worrying a few non-existent risk from Al-Qaeda.
There’s an previous saying, “as soon as bitten, twice shy,” that captures the uncertainty of an individual who has suffered by a nasty expertise, solely to search out his or herself as soon as once more on a path they consider is resulting in the same ordeal. This idiom captures the essence of present US enthusiastic about Al-Qaeda and Afghanistan as we speak.
In testimony delivered earlier than the Nationwide Safety Summit, a bevy of US nationwide safety and overseas coverage officers supplied up their assessments as to what the long run held for the terrorist group that was chargeable for the 9/11 assaults on the US that destroyed the World Commerce Heart, broken the Pentagon, and killed almost three,000 civilians. The US considerations about Al-Qaeda have been projected by a coverage prism, closely influenced by the truth that the summit came about on the heels of each the 20th anniversary of the terrorist assault and a humiliating departure from Afghanistan by the US and its allies following the seizure of that nation by the Taliban.
Additionally on rt.com
20 years after 9/11, I now not acknowledge my nation. The US has grow to be a malignant narcissist, infecting all it encounters
The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001, barely one month after the 9/11 assaults, initiating a 20-year occupation which noticed the US declare struggle on each Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The prevailing knowledge on the time was that the Taliban had supplied Al-Qaeda with a haven from which it was in a position to plan and manage the 9/11 assaults, and as such had grow to be a co-conspirator that wanted to be eradicated.
The victory of the Taliban has raised considerations amongst US officers that Afghanistan might as soon as once more grow to be a base of operations for Al-Qaeda that may put the US homeland vulnerable to assault. This regardless that the Taliban, as a part of a peace settlement negotiated in February 2020, had supplied assurances that underneath their rule Afghanistan would by no means once more play host to overseas terrorist organizations comparable to Al-Qaeda.
The risk image offered by the US authorities, nevertheless, is kind of muted when in comparison with the New York Instances headline. Whereas Secretary of State Antony Blinken testified that the ties between Al-Qaeda and the Taliban have “not been severed,” Avril Haines, the director of nationwide intelligence, famous that Afghanistan, even underneath the Taliban, didn’t rise to the risk degree offered by different nations comparable to Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, and Syria. David Cohen, the deputy director of the CIA, testified that his group is actively monitoring the scenario in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan for “some potential motion of Al-Qaeda to Afghanistan,” whereas Lieutenant Normal Scott Berrier, the director of the Protection Intelligence Company, assessed that it will take Al-Qaeda between one and two years to rebuild functionality inside Afghanistan that may allow it to threaten the US homeland.
One should remember that the present evaluation is being made following a 20-year battle during which the US beforehand claimed to have all however eradicated Al-Qaeda from Afghanistan. In Might 2009, for example, Normal David Petraeus, who on the time was serving because the commander of Central Command, chargeable for all US forces working inside Afghanistan, famous that whereas Al-Qaeda and its associates could have “enclaves and sanctuaries” remaining inside Afghanistan, the terrorist group had suffered “very vital losses,” permitting Petraeus to echo then-Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s evaluation that Al-Qaeda was now not based mostly in Afg hanistan.
Petraeus’ evaluation was seconded by Normal James Jones, President Barack Obama’s nationwide safety advisor, in October 2009. Jones acknowledged that the US believed there have been fewer than 100 Al-Qaeda operatives left inside Afghanistan, and that the management of Al-Qaeda was based mostly throughout the border, within the tribal areas of Pakistan.
Jones’ evaluation was mirrored by then-CIA Director Leon Panetta, who estimated that there have been just some “50 to 100 Al-Qaeda” operatives based mostly in all of Afghanistan. Following a US-led assault on Al-Qaeda-affiliated coaching camps working in Kandahar Province in October 2015, leading to some 100 fighters being killed and one other 50 wounded, analysts (and the media) used the claimed info as proof that the US intelligence neighborhood was intentionally downplaying the true dimension of Al-Qaeda inside Afghanistan. The fact, nevertheless, was that the US strikes had hit an Afghan Baluchi resistance group allied with the Taliban, known as Junood al Fida. Whereas the management of Junood al Fida had sworn its loyalty to Al-Qaeda, the group was not a part of any bigger Al-Qaeda effort to assault the US, however quite a extra localized effort centered on driving the US out of Afghanistan.
Learn extra
Convey all of them dwelling, Mr. President. The US has failed in Afghanistan, the least we will do is get People out safely
At the moment, there’s little proof that the group chargeable for the 9/11 exists in any significant type on Afghanistan soil. The unique Al-Qaeda model (i.e., these loyal to Osama Bin Laden), which was certainly plotting to hold out assaults towards the US as late as 2016, seems to have been largely annihilated by the US by a program of focused assassinations utilizing drone strikes and particular operations forces. The variant of Al-Qaeda most outstanding inside Afghanistan belongs to an off-shoot, Al-Qaeda within the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), and seems to be carefully allied with Taliban goals inside Afghanistan. AQIS’ members have been – and are – centered on coaching with and combating alongside the Taliban to evict American forces from Afghanistan. These fighters, few in quantity, dwell alongside the Afghan tribes and villages. Whereas the efficacy of their help to the Taliban is unknown, it may be safely stated that they pose completely no risk to the US.
When considered on this mild, US claims that Al-Qaeda is searching for to rebuild itself as an Afghan-based entity able to putting targets within the US homeland within two years are pure fantasy. The Taliban is an umbrella group which has integrated various resistance actions devoted to the ousting of the US from Afghanistan. These teams embody former members of Al-Qaeda who’ve intermarried into Afghan tribes, in addition to followers of the present Al-Qaeda management who’ve aligned themselves with the Taliban in the course of the closing marketing campaign to evict the US and NATO forces.
When the Taliban, as a part of the February 2020 peace settlement, promised to not goal US and NATO forces as long as they stored to the agreed-upon timetable of Might 2021 for the ultimate evacuation of overseas troops, they stored their phrase. Even when Biden broke this settlement, the Taliban, in subsequent negotiations, agreed to increase the moratorium of attacking US and overseas troops to a brand new deadline of August 31, 2021. The Taliban stored their phrase. The Taliban, furthermore, have promised to not permit Afghan soil for use as a base from which terrorist organizations might plot and implement a brand new sequence of assaults towards the US homeland.
It’s far too early to find out whether or not the Taliban will preserve their phrase. Nevertheless, there’s each purpose to consider that the Taliban will do all the pieces potential to defeat one recognized anti-US terrorist group, the Islamic State-Khorasan Province, working inside Afghanistan, which claimed accountability for the August assault close to Kabul airport. The Taliban has a historical past of conducting brutal operations to eradicate IS-KP (often known as ISIS-Ok) from Afghanistan. On condition that the Taliban is dedicated to imprinting its model of Islamic authorities on all of Afghanistan, the chance that it’ll discover frequent trigger with IS-KP is nil.
The Taliban has acknowledged that it seeks a extra inclusive, reasonable type of Islamic authorities going ahead, having realized the teachings of the previous, the place Taliban intolerance helped cement widespread Afghan opposition to its trigger. At this time the Taliban seeks overseas recognition and the financial investments such recognition brings. The very last thing the Taliban could be searching for to do as we speak is resurrect the reminiscences of the previous, together with the type of tolerance of overseas Al-Qaeda operatives plotting assaults on the US that triggered the US invasion and occupation within the first place.
So why, then, the confusion within the high quality of the assessments about the way forward for Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan? First, the US intelligence neighborhood is, for the primary time in over 20 years, largely flying blind in the case of well timed intelligence concerning the scenario inside Afghanistan. Within the span of lower than one yr, the US intelligence neighborhood has misplaced its huge networks of human brokers and imagery and communications intercept platforms. The shortage of well timed uncooked information about Afghanistan has compelled the intelligence neighborhood to problem extraordinarily conservative assessments that discern threats the place none can conclusively be proven to exist.
Second, having witnessed the implications of downplaying the risk posed by Al-Qaeda to the US homeland within the leadup to the 9/11 assaults, no US official or company will ever permit its evaluation of the potential risk posed by Al-Qaeda to offer any wiggle room for armchair quarterbacking by critics ought to one other assault ever happen – everybody needs to be within the place of claiming “I informed you so.” As such, an Al-Qaeda risk shall be claimed even when no information exists to help this evaluation.
Additionally on rt.com
On this present day, 25 years in the past, Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda declared struggle on America – however no one listened
“As soon as bitten, twice shy” is turning into the brand new mantra of the US authorities in the case of Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. This sort of manufactured/exaggerated risk projection, nevertheless, whereas providing cowl in the case of potential home political blame video games, will serve to freeze the US out of the type of hands-on diplomacy that the US needs to be engaged in with Afghanistan as we speak, ceding the reconstruction of Afghanistan and all that follows to Russia, China, Iran, and others.
