Fb tells employees to anticipate ‘extra unhealthy headlines’ amid DAMNING stories primarily based on whistleblower leaks – media

Fb has reportedly advised staffers to “metal [themselves]” towards “extra unhealthy headlines” within the “coming days” amid the continued publication of essential information articles citing inside stories leaked by whistleblower Frances Haugen.

In a memo despatched on Saturday, which was seen by Axios, Fb Vice-President of International Affairs Nick Clegg apparently warned staff that the information protection would seemingly comprise “mischaracterizations of our analysis, our motives and the place our priorities lie.” He instructed them to “hear and be taught from criticism when it’s honest, and push again strongly when it’s not.”

“However above all else… We must always maintain our heads held excessive and do the work we got here right here to do,” Clegg reportedly advised staffers within the memo. The warning got here as stories emerged about how the corporate doesn’t perceive how its personal algorithms work and struggles to fight hate speech, amongst different failings.

Earlier this month, Frances Haugen, a former product supervisor in Fb’s civic misinformation staff, testified in US Congress that the corporate prioritized “revenue over security,” doesn’t take sufficient precautions to make sure the security of its 2.9 billion customers, and downplays the hurt it might trigger to society. She mentioned it has repeatedly misled each buyers and the general public.

Additionally on rt.com

The 1000’s of pages of inside memos Haugen leaked provide a glimpse into the tech big’s interior workings. In keeping with a number of paperwork, staff had spoken out about how its central algorithms reward outrage and hate speech. A June 2020 memo famous that it was “just about assured” that key Fb’s techniques present “systemic biases primarily based on the race of the affected person” – suggesting that content material from some racial backgrounds are being prioritized.

One other observe by a analysis group in March 2021 confirmed that Fb acts on as few as between three% and 5% of instances referring to hate speech and about zero.6% of instances involving violent content material. As a result of it’s “terribly difficult” for algorithms to know language context, one memo countered Fb’s claims about its synthetic intelligence packages’ means to identify hate speech and abuse. It mentioned that the platform would wrestle to take away something past 10-20% of such content material.

By 2019, nonetheless, Fb had apparently determined to rely extra on AI content material moderation and commenced to scale back funding for human oversight when it got here to hate speech. In keeping with the paperwork, issues got here to a head throughout the January 6 Capitol riots when the corporate allegedly struggled to curb the unfold of hate speech and misinformation on its platform.

Leaked memos by Haugen element how Fb had turned off some emergency safeguards too quickly after the November 2020 election, solely to then rush to change these again on after Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol. The hate-speech downside is outwardly a lot worse in non-English-speaking international locations – with one doc revealing that in 2020 the corporate solely devoted 13% of its finances for growing misinformation detection algorithms to combating threats exterior the US.

Additionally on rt.com

Nevertheless, Clegg wrote in his memo that Fb had invested $ 13 billion and employed over 40,000 individuals to “do one job: maintain individuals secure on Fb.” That declare was repeated by the tech big’s spokesperson Joe Osborne, who advised the Monetary Instances that the “premise” behind the essential reportage was “false.”

“Sure, we’re a enterprise and we make revenue, however the concept that we accomplish that on the expense of individuals’s security or well-being misunderstands the place our personal business pursuits lie,” Osborne mentioned.

Roughly two-dozen media shops have apparently accessed the supplies leaked by Haugen, who is about to testify earlier than the UK Parliament on Monday. Her leaks have been trumpeted by critics of Fb, who accuse it of being too sluggish and too restrained in quashing dangerous content material on its platform.

Final week, Fb Vice-President of Communications John Pinette accused the information shops of an “orchestrated ‘gotcha’ marketing campaign” and mentioned the corporate would “appropriate the report” since a “curated choice” of paperwork wouldn’t have the ability to “draw honest conclusions” about it.

Additionally on rt.com

In case you like this story, share it with a good friend!