Poland’s resolution to not invite Russia however to ask leaders of ex-Axis powers to its WWII 80th commemorations, plus its renewed demand for reparations, reveals that outdated historic enmities are nonetheless poisoning Europe’s ambiance.
In September 1939 Poland was invaded by two completely different international locations. On September 1, there was a large assault from the air, land and sea by Nazi Germany. On September 17, the Soviet Union attacked from the east, to re-occupy territory that had been misplaced to Poland within the 1919-1921 Polish-Soviet struggle.
Whereas each invasions have been improper, and crimes and atrocities have been dedicated in each, by any goal evaluation the Nazi invasion was essentially the most damaging, when it comes to the brutality of the occupation, the numbers killed – and in its world penalties. It was, in any case, the invasion of 1st September that triggered the beginning of the Second World Battle, as simply two days later Britain, France and Australia declared struggle on Germany. The demise toll within the Second World Battle has been estimated at between 60 and 85 million.
But, whereas Poland had no downside in inviting the German President to Warsaw, they did have an issue in inviting the Russian one.
Additionally on rt.com
It appears we’ve now gone past ‘twin accountability’ WWII revision to ‘Russia/Soviet Union was extra responsible than Nazi Germany’ revision.
Russia’s ‘invasion’ of Crimea in 2014 has been cited as a cause for the non-invite, however to name it an ‘invasion’ is absurd. What occurred is that Crimea (the place ethnic Russians kind a sizeable majority) voted in a referendum to return to Russia following an unlawful ‘regime change’ in Kiev wherein anti-Russian nationalist teams have been on the forefront.
In any case, if the Polish authorities have such an objection to what occurred in Crimea, why have been they internet hosting US Vice-President Pence, whose nation has invaded/attacked extra international locations than some other in latest a long time? For those who oppose the comparatively cold ‘invasion’ of Crimea, how will you help or defend the unlawful invasion of Iraq, which led to the deaths of over one million folks?
The WWII commemoration might have been an amazing alternative for Poland to display statesmanship. They may have invited the leaders of all the primary protagonists of WWII and labored to get a joint declaration signed by the leaders, vowing ‘By no means Once more’. As a substitute, as Mark Santora of the NY Instances studies: “President Andrzej Duda used the event to chide different European leaders for not taking the menace posed by Russian aggression critically, making an analogy to the insurance policies of appeasement that allowed the Nazi occasion to rise in Germany.”
What can we are saying about politicians who use struggle commemorations not as a possibility for reconciliation between outdated adversaries, however as a possibility to foment new tensions? I refer not simply to the far-from-cool dude Duda however to Mike Pence, who fairly considerably mentioned the “twin invasions” of Poland in September 1939, and never the Nazi one, “marked the start” of the Second World Battle. Once more, he was placing a recent anti-Russian agenda above correct commemoration.
Additionally on rt.com
Let’s get one factor straight. Russia just isn’t about to invade Poland. ‘Russian aggression’ is in actual fact a fact-free neocon mantra, in the identical approach ‘Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction’ was in 2002/three.
It’s repeated robotically by roughly the identical folks.
How great it could have been to see the leaders of Poland, Germany, Russia and the US hyperlink arms this weekend in Warsaw. However Poland prefers to maintain issues Chilly.
Whereas nobody disputes the massive value the nation paid in World Two (round 17% of the inhabitants, together with three million Jews, perished), there comes some extent when Warsaw’s persevering with anti-Russian hostility turns into somewhat disturbing. It’s completely improper to answer this by indulging in mirror-image Polonophobia and blaming Poland for the beginning of WWII, as some Russian political figures have in latest days.
On the identical time, Poland should not be past criticism in 2019 due to what occurred to the nation up to now. No nation, or folks, on the earth is an everlasting sufferer or an everlasting villain. Whereas documenting the completely appalling crimes and aggressions dedicated in opposition to Poland and making it clear that two wrongs don’t make a proper, we should additionally acknowledge that the massive Ukrainian and Belarussian minorities had been persecuted in Poland previous to the 1939 invasions and ethnic Germans have been massacred in response, in September 1939. In his historical past of Belarus ‘The Final Soviet Republic’ Stewart Parker relates how, in November 1935, ‘a big focus camp’ was established in Bereza Kartuska ‘for the internment of socially harmful components.’ This included ‘leaders of Belarussian employees’ unions, and members of the Belarussian intelligentsia.’ Parker says that round 10,000 Belarussians had been imprisoned by the Polish authorities for political causes within the 1930s and that the arrival of the Crimson Military ‘was greeted enthusiastically by most western Belarussians as that they had lived below direct persecution in Poland.’
Additionally on rt.com
Poland is now demanding extra reparations from Germany, who thought the matter had been settled, and the way in which issues are going, most likely quickly from Russia, too.
Once more, it is a very delicate challenge, and you must see each side, however is the Polish stance aiding reconciliation or hindering it? It was laborious not to be moved by the German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier asking for forgiveness from Poland for Germany’s ‘historic guilt’ on Sunday. At what level will this forgiveness be accepted? At what level does failure to just accept forgiveness turn out to be, in itself, an uncharitable act? The Polish President clearly doesn’t assume that time has been reached, and says that “turning a blind eye just isn’t the recipe for preserving peace.” He appears to strongly oppose European rapprochement with Russia and is in opposition to Russia being readmitted to the G-7 group of highly effective international locations.
However, as we bear in mind the horrors of WWII, how can prolonging historic enmities be good for ‘preserving peace’ both?
Suppose your mates would have an interest? Share this story!